If a client responds negatively to training materials, what is the best course of action?

When a client responds negatively to training materials, the best course of action is to communicate with the supervising SLP. This step is crucial for several reasons. First, the supervising SLP has the professional expertise and experience to assess the situation and determine the best next steps. They can provide guidance on how to address the client's difficulties and may also have insights into why the materials are not resonating with the client.

Additionally, involving the supervising SLP fosters collaboration and ensures that any changes or adaptations made are aligned with the overall treatment plan. It also ensures that appropriate adjustments can be made while taking into account the client's individual needs, preferences, and therapeutic goals. This communication also supports professional accountability, as the SLP assistant is working under the supervision of a licensed practitioner.

This option emphasizes the importance of teamwork in speech-language pathology, where addressing challenges collaboratively is key to providing effective client-centered care. In contrast, revising training materials, changing the client’s goals, or conducting a different type of evaluation may not address the root of the issue effectively or may lack professional oversight, thus making direct communication with the supervising SLP the most appropriate first step.